"𝗧𝗵𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿." That’s what an actress told a journalist while revealing she was on GLP—1 (New Yorker: 2023).
And that is the Problem. This narrative reduces GLP—1s to a weight-loss drug, distorting their true impact— which has led to misuse and inaccessibility for those who actually need them.
🚀 𝗛𝘆𝗽𝗲-𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱 → DrugShortages for diabetes & obesity patients
📉 𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗺𝗮 → “Shaming” instead of informed medical use
💰 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 → $1000/month price tags LimitingAccess
But now, thanks to an RWE study by Yan Xie, Taeyoung Choi, Ziyad Al-Aly (2025, Nature Magazine) (approx. 3.7 years of data: https://lnkd.in/dN7V2sa3), we have evidence that these drugs aren’t just about the number on the scale:
✅ GLP-1s are metabolic interventions—not just weight-loss drugs.
✅ They reduce cardiovascular risk, neurodegeneration, and even addiction.
✅ They challenge outdated views on obesity, metabolism, and chronic disease.
For years, these GLP—1s have been prescribed without fully mapping their longterm impact across different health systems. This study analyzed 175 different HealthOutcomes, providing a risk-benefit map across metabolic, cardiovascular, neurological, and renal systems—a massive evidence gap that needed filling.
📌 Why This RWD Matters
Because GLP—1s have gone from life-saving therapy to luxury item, while those with legitimate metabolic conditions struggle to access them.
So now, this isn’t just an academic discussion—it’s about evidence-driven treatment narrative. This study pushes us to rethink:
❓ What new evidence do we need to redefine obesity treatment beyond BMI and weight?
❓What new metabolic links between the heart, brain, and behavior are emerging from GLP—1Research?
❓How do we leverage RWE to ensure access for those who need it most—not just those who can afford it?
The RWD is here. Now, it’s up to us how we move beyond outdated narratives.
Comentários